- MAC BOOK FOR VIDEO EDITING UPGRADE
- MAC BOOK FOR VIDEO EDITING PRO
- MAC BOOK FOR VIDEO EDITING SOFTWARE
- MAC BOOK FOR VIDEO EDITING PROFESSIONAL
While most non-native applications will run, we did run into a few intermittent crashes.
MAC BOOK FOR VIDEO EDITING SOFTWARE
Our video producer uses a range of other creative software and how well these applications run has been rather hit or miss. Switching to optimized native code, performance has been virtually flawless and more snappy than the 6-core i7 Intel machine (with twice the RAM) that we’d been using up to this point. Apart from an inexplicable lack of MP3 support, that is. Switching to the beta, we haven’t encountered any issues with missing features for our workflow. Performance was acceptable, but there were definitely performance issues with a stuttering timeline every now and then. Recently Adobe has released an M1-optimized beta version of the software which isn’t quite feature-complete.įor the first week or so of editing on our M1, we used the existing Adobe version through Rosetta 2. Our editing suite of choice is Adobe Premiere Pro, but as you may know there is no M1-optimized version of the software.
MAC BOOK FOR VIDEO EDITING PRO
So it should only take a fraction of a second to load video data on the timeline in and out as needed.Ĭonsider that you can edit 4K video on an iPad Pro with only 4GB of RAM so it seems far more plausible that 8GB can accomplish this much here. Theoretically the M1 MacBook can fill the entire 8GB of RAM in 3-4 seconds. This means that data can be streamed in and out of memory almost instantly. The M1 MacBooks have essentially doubled SSD read and write performance compared to the preceding Intel generation of Macs. We think the secret to why this is even possible comes down to the incredibly fast SSD and tightly integrated IO controllers. Some of the demonstrations we’ve seen have multiple 4K streams on the timeline in high-end formats. While it seems that 8GB of unified memory isn’t enough to edit 4K video in real-time, it’s no issue here. It’s clear that, as with iOS devices, the M1 Macs shouldn’t be compared to other architectures when it comes to memory. We Had To Rethink RAMīefore taking the plunge and ordering an M1 MacBook Pro, we watched a lot of YouTube videos where different content creators showcase video editing performance on the machine.
MAC BOOK FOR VIDEO EDITING PROFESSIONAL
That’s not a GPU you’d want for gaming, but it’s still plenty of grunt for GPU-accelerated professional work. Benchmarks put it somewhere above the GTX 1050Ti. The custom Apple GPU in the M1 has nowhere near that amount of graphics muscle.Ĭonsidering that modern video editing makes heavy use of GPU acceleration, that was another point of concern. The Windows machine sported an Nvidia GTX 1660Ti. We’ll get to that in just a moment.įinally, the other large sacrifice was the loss of a dedicated GPU. While the SSD issue is easily solved by using external storage, at least in most cases, we were genuinely worried about only having 8GB of RAM. If not, you’re looking at replacing the entire system sooner rather than later. When buying one of these M1 systems you have to buy the model that will serve your future needs today.
In addition, we opted for the largest available SSD at the time, specifically the 512GB model. There were absolutely no 16GB M1 MacBooks available at the time of purchase, so we had no choice but to buy the 8GB model.
MAC BOOK FOR VIDEO EDITING UPGRADE
In contrast, the M1 system-on-a-chip offers no way to upgrade RAM. It also has two NVME slots and a 2.5” SATA drive bay. The Windows laptop has user upgradable RAM, supporting as much as 32GB. The biggest thing we had to give up by switching to the M1 was any hope of upgradability. It would (in theory) provide similar performance to the Windows machine we were using, but with the improved stability of macOS. With the M1 MacBook Pro posting benchmark scores in the same ballpark as the Intel 16” model at a fraction of the price, we saw this as an opportunity to make the switch. We knew a macOS device would be more stable, but a MacBook Pro 16 was out of the question in terms of budget and the Intel MacBook Pro 13 simply did not have enough power to be practical.
0 kommentar(er)
